data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99f94/99f9416b46b025969c7147a2d9208528b8cea2a8" alt=""
Nooooo! We are extremely upset that one of our most favoritest actors, the amazing Aaron Eckhart, has chosen to be in a film being described by critics and audiences as "kiddie porn."
We are a huge supporter of child rights, and the glorification of child sexual exploitation goes against the grain of our very soul. :(
We freaked when we heard that Eckhart starred in
Nothing is Private, a
film about a child rapist by Alan Ball, the screenwriter of
American Beauty. The actress in the film was 18 years old but playing a 13-year-old. We won't go into more details about specific scenes (the articles we've linked do that.)
We really liked
American Beauty the first time we saw it when we were a teenager. But the creepy sexual scenes between Mena Suvari's high school character and Kevin Spacey's pervy Dad character left us really icked out. If this is the next step for Ball, making his underage sexual abusees younger and younger, we're sickened. Now, we totally mentally lump him in with gutter pervs Woody Allen and Roman Polanski.
We read a couple of reviews like
this one. But we're super-interested to hear what Roger Ebert has to say about this film. We've read his review of
Caligula and are expecting something starting along those lines, but we'll see. We're going to be monitoring this one because with the huge rise in child pornography (internet child porn - including live streaming video of molestation - is a multi-billion-dollar-a-year industry we are incredibly sad
to report,) anyone who's aim is to desensitize the viewing audience to atrocities committed against children has our eternal hatred. (Reading the Fark comments about this movie was totally gross.)
The other big names attached to this film are: Toni Collette and Maria Bello.
PS. Apologies to Sam Mendes; we mixed up the name of the director of
American Beauty with the screenwriter. Alan Ball wrote
American Beauty and directed
Nothing Is Private. We have corrected that error - thanks to
Brij for pointing that out.